For quite some time now, there have been complaints concerning the potency of cannabis products. Most of the time, the concerns have been centered around products that are too potent, resulting in undesired effects. However, things are getting heated after two upset customers decided to sue a California-based cannabis company on the grounds of having sold pre-rolled joints that were not as potent as they claimed.
According to CNN, the two individuals filed the lawsuit on Oct. 20 against the cannabis company known as DreamFields Brands, Inc. The lawsuit was filed on the basis that the company had “allegedly falsely” claimed that their products had a higher THC component than they actually did. The two individuals, Jasper Centeno of Long Beach and Blake Wilson of Fresno, have accused DreamFields of being unfair competition and partaking in false advertising, as well as accusing them of negligent representation.
The lawsuit claims, “Because cannabis consumers generally prefer and are willing to pay more for high-THC cannabis products, declaring that their products have a very high THC content allows Defendants [like DreamFields Brands, Inc.] to charge premium rates for their cannabis products.” However, the products purchased by the pair of individuals were independently tested and revealed that they contained lower THC content than they claimed, yet they were charging consumers premium product prices.
As you would know, the cannabis industry has many different regulations depending on which state the company and consumer are based in. For the state of California, cannabis companies are compelled to label their products with THC content, either as a percentage or in milligrams. Additionally, the quantity of THC expressed on the label needs to be within 10% of the actual THC content of the product itself.
Wilson and Centeno claim that DreamFields is “systematically overstating the THC content to deceive consumers into thinking that the effects of their prerolls are more potent than they truly are.” Christin Cho, one of the lawyers representing Centeno and Wilson, explains that the lawsuit is being brought on in order to “protect California consumers, to protect cannabis consumers from being overcharged.”
The pre-roll in question is being sold under the brand Jeeter, a subsidiary of DreamFields. In a statement to CNN, Jeeter denies the allegation and describes their lawsuit as “baseless and ridiculous”:
“The allegations regarding our THC levels are false. We take pride in our compliance and commitment to state-mandated testing procedures, including independent, third-party testing. The product and our integrity [are] something we truly value as a company, and take all the proper and legal steps before our product hits the shelves.”
Regardless, the company stated that it will take it “very seriously” and that the leaders “look forward to the truth coming to light.” Jeeter’s website boasts about its strongest joints containing at least 30% THC. However, the independent testing done by the pair suing DreamFields found that a pre-rolled joint claiming to have 46% THC only had around 23-27% THC—which exceeds the 10% allowance in difference between the label and the amount the product contains.
The law firm representing Centeno and Wilson, Dovel & Luner, explains that the lawsuit was filed in the Superior Court of the State of California County of Los Angeles. They explain that DreamFields has violated consumer protection laws of California by violating California’s Unfair Competition Law and False Advertising Law, “among other violations.”
While we do not know the specifics, Dovel & Luner explain that Jeeter products have been “substantially overstating the amount of actual THC in the product, sometimes by 70-100%.” They go on to express their concern for consumers by stating that “consumers reasonably believe that they are receiving a product that has the THC content that is listed on the label.”
While it is too soon for a verdict to be made, we know that two of Jeeter’s products have been confirmed to contain less THC than advertised on the label: The Baby Jeeter Fire OG Diamond Infused 5-pack pre-roll contained 23-27% THC compared to the 46% being advertised on the label, and the Baby Jeeter Churros Diamond Infused 5-pack pre-roll contained 26-29% compared to the 37% advertised on the label.
While the Baby Jeeter Churros Diamond Infused 5-pack may be dismissed on account of the 10% variation regulation, the Baby Jeeter Fire OG Diamond Infused 5-pack preroll is clearly ripping off consumers. While Jeeter claims to be proud of its compliance and commitment to the mandated testing procedures, and although they assure that the products have been third-party tested, there have been concerns about cannabis lab-testing on account of THC content being inflated by third-party testers to help their clients sell their products.
Perhaps the biggest concern isn’t even that certain products do not contain as much THC as they claim to have, but rather that the sources that are supposed to reassure consumers may be unreliable. In other words, how are we supposed to trust third-party testing when some of these operations may be corrupt?
Yes! I wish they would crack down on this harder and more often. So tired of buying gummies or a candy bar and needing to eat the whole thing to feel something, i know my tolerance isnt that high! This is far to common!
I have been paying attention to this for quite some time. Most people are focused on THCA which is more advertised than THC located in the terpins.
Always check the stats and don’t rely on the brand. My favorite brand went from a 1.11 THC to a 0.01%👀
It was almost feeling like a death in the family your favorite brand letting you down.
I’m glad to see this subject is coming to life I thought I was the only one driving the kids at the dispensary crazy.
Excellent read. It seems my hope that the third party testing would not be misused is gone.
I’m not really too concerned about the strength claims because if it’s not what you want you don’t buy it again. My concern is that pesticides and chemical fertilizers could be overlooked for profit as well as potency claims.
I’ve been less than thrilled with the mmj program here. Expensive gmo weed. It’s over rated.
What makes this most unsettling is patients are paying top shelve prices for items that are clearly not top shelve. Would you be ok with going into a bar and paying for a shot of Patron but getting a shot of Jose Quervo? Greed
Blunts: What are they exactly, and how do they affect your body? If you’re interested in smoking blunts—or already smoke them—this guide is for you. We’ll cover everything you need to know about this popular cannabis intake method, including how they’re made, how they differ from spliffs and joints, risks of use, and alternative intake…
“Stoned,” “high,” “tripping,” and “baked,” are all terms engrained in the cannabis community. These metaphorical descriptions contribute to how we perceive, interpret, and learn from the experiences produced by cannabis consumption. Cannabis experiences, of course, are unique and highly variable. Specific plant strains, the presence of other cannabinoids, different delivery methods, and a user’s individual…
Thanks to the growing wave of legalization, more consumers than ever can grow their own cannabis right at home. Growing essentials that used to be secretive are now bought and sold freely. This includes items, like grow tents, nutrients, LED lighting, HPS lighting, ventilation, and more. Keeping all these items straight is hard enough, but…
Skin diseases plague millions of individuals, inflicting both physical discomforts in addition to mental and social stress. Thankfully, there is no shortage of skin treatment options available on the market. That said, this established market may soon be in for a major shake-up if recent cannabis research is any indication. Traditionally, cannabis research focused on studying…
As more states move toward legalization, accurately detecting impaired driving is of the utmost importance. Field Sobriety Tests (FSTs) have long been the go-to method for law enforcement to assess driver impairment caused by substances like alcohol. However, a recent 2023 study published in JAMA Psychiatry raises serious questions about the accuracy of these tests…
