Chief Justice John Marshall famously stated that “the power to tax involves the power to destroy”. This may prove true as heavy taxes get imposed as legalization progresses. Most commodities have a tax included in their products but when there is the same commodity available that is tax-free, who will want to buy the more expensive taxed product? Let’s explore whether taxes will drive consumers to the illicit market instead of towards cannabis dispensaries. This research is vital since one of the main reasons behind legalization is to steer cannabis consumers away from the illegal channels not towards them.
Cannabis tax can be defined as a compulsory contribution to state revenue that is levied by the government on cannabis products. According to Tax Policy Center, individuals unknowingly, or otherwise, pay a levy on three types of cannabis tax which are based on a percentage of the price, the weight of the product, and the potency of the product.
This type of tax is similar to retail sales tax and can be explained as a percentage of the product price being remit to the state. This tax type is often included in the final sale price for consumers.
This type of tax is similar to the tax imposed on cigarettes, with the difference being that one is not being taxed per box of cigarettes but rather based on the weight of the cannabis product. For example, California taxes $9.65 per ounce on flower, $2.83 per ounce on leaves, and $1.35 per ounce on fresh plant material.
This type of tax is similar to the tax imposed on alcohol with the difference being that consumers are not being taxed on the percentage of alcohol but rather on the percentage of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in the product. Illinois is the only state with THC-based tax and charges as follows: 35% or less of THC taxed at 10% of the retail price, while THC content exceeding 35% is taxed at 25% of the retail price.
Data from Tax Policy Center states that the revenue collected from cannabis tax is used as follows:
Taxes are definitely encouraging the use of illegal markets in many areas where cannabis is legal and will continue to do so unless something changes. The problem with imposing cannabis taxes is that the legal market is selling a commodity that has already been available through illicit channels for more years than cannabis has been legalized and decriminalized. As mentioned before, displacing the illegal market is one of the main goals for legalizing cannabis. However, the tax structures proposed and currently being implemented accomplish the opposite since they drive up the price for cannabis products significantly.
Despite the legalization of cannabis, many consumers who may have tried to become dedicated patrons of the legal market ultimately chose to continue purchasing from the illicit market. One may suggest that the increase in expense associated with the legal market has something to do with that.
When we consider that consumers are expected to pay, for example, $9.25 tax per ounce, 15% retail tax rates, and 9% retail sales tax, the overall cannabis price comes up to around 77% more expensive than the cannabis available on the illegal market. Many people turn to cannabis because it is effective, easily accessible, and far more inexpensive than pharmaceutical medications. The legal cannabis market is missing its mark if consumers still have to turn to the illicit market for inexpensive products due to hefty tax impositions.
Cannabis tax revenue may be honorably spent on social measures intended to bring justice to disparity, but what value do these intentions have if they only continue to support illegal channels?
Forbes offered up insight by stating that “cannabis tax is a good way to identify bad actors, address the illegal market and bring in additional revenue”. These taxes may be bringing in additional revenue for the governing bodies but if they desire to attract more cannabis consumers to the legal market, they will need to restructure or revise the current tax policies for cannabis in order to maintain the inexpensive nature of cannabis for consumers. Additionally, the hefty tax on cannabis does not address the illegal market, as Forbes stated, which can be examined by the lack of interest in the legal markets and by the continued use of illicit markets for inexpensive cannabis.
“We contend that for a nation to try to tax itself into prosperity is like a man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle” -Winston S. Churchill
“Do you prefer an indica or a sativa?” is typically the first question asked at a dispensary. Indica vs. sativa refers to the two main categories of cannabis strains. Both indicas and sativas differ in appearance and effects. Indicas are generally known for a sedating effect, while sativa strains are known for a cerebral high….
Cancer can be a harrowing journey, not only due to the disease itself but also because of the relentless pain that often accompanies it. Conventional pain management strategies, such as opioids and other medications, can sometimes fall short in providing lasting relief or cause undesirable side effects. But what if a safe and effective complementary…
A bill was passed to legalize the possession and sharing of certain psychedelics for Californians aged 21 and above. The bill underwent an accelerated process that allowed it to bypass further committee consideration; thus, it was moved directly to the Senate floor. The legislation was sponsored by Sen. Scott Wiener (D), and he explained that…
The U.S. Secret Service (USSS) recently loosened its applicant drug use policy to be more accommodating to past cannabis consumers. Candidates of all ages can now apply to join the agency if they have abstained from marijuana for one year before applying. Before this policy, cannabis use within the past three years led to automatic disqualification. …
Ohio introduced a legalization bill, cannabis and psilocybin could be the future of cancer care, and a ketamine company is looking to take the lead in the space. Let’s dive into this week’s canna-news. Ohio Eyes Legalization With HB 168 Ohio is inching closer to making cannabis legalization a reality. The bipartisan-backed House Bill 168—the…
Currently, numerous scientific studies support using cannabis for pain and inflammation. For example, a noteworthy study published by the Journal of the…
June is Alzheimer’s and Brain Awareness Month, and we’re diving into the role of cannabis in brain health. In today’s fast-paced world,…
Tara Davis-Woodhall, a 23-year-old U.S. long jumper, was stripped of the national indoor title she obtained in February after testing positive for…
Marc Colon says:
May 26, 2021 at 10:56 am
Taxation without representation . Unfair Taxation and various levels of greed direct all of it . WOW !
Joseph. C. Greco says:
May 28, 2021 at 8:55 pm
I have no problem paying taxes we paid them all our lives this is a good thing for a good product I’ve been smoking since 1969 so I’d rather smoke great stuff and pay the tax a Veterans
Harold Gelnaw says:
May 29, 2021 at 9:00 am
It’s not just the taxes that are going to drive people back to the street dealers it’s also the incredibly high price for garbage product
Chante Dukes says:
July 8, 2021 at 12:58 am
The only reason they agreed to legalize marijuana is so they can get money off of our medical disabilities If it had not been a way to tax it. It wouldn’t be legal. I think it’s BS and the taxi s ridiculously high and yes it will make people go to the illicit because you’re not helping the situation you’re harming it i! t’s crazy how it’s always only about the money. They only want to capitalize off of it.They’re in it for the money they can make! Unfortunately thats nothing new that’s how it is in the United States